Boston Globe - September 9, 2007
What renaissance?
Lowell has achieved national fame for its turnaround. But the
revival is overrated, analysts argue, and now cities are looking for new
models.
By Alan Wirzbicki
hen
students ask to meet with Robert Forrant, a professor of regional economics
at the University of Massachusetts at Lowell, he summons them to Brew'd
Awakening, a coffee shop in the revamped center of the state's
fourth-largest city.
Without the coaxing, he said, few of his students would make the
15-minute walk from campus into downtown, where many businesses have
struggled to stay afloat.
"It's the only way they'll come into Lowell," said Forrant on a recent
morning over a mug of java.
In its heyday, politicians and national publications hailed the
resurrection of Lowell as the definitive model for troubled cities ruined by
the collapse of the textile industry. The city's revival project, which
began in the 1970s and became nationally influential in the 1980s and 1990s,
created artsy downtown hangouts like Brew'd Awakening and transformed the
crumbling Massachusetts Mills complex and other abandoned brick factory
buildings into hundreds of new condos and apartments. The city has long been
considered one of the nation's great success stories, and its turnaround
strategies have been copied by other distressed areas.
But now Forrant and other specialists are questioning the Lowell miracle.
On key economic indicators like income growth and job creation, the city
differs little from other ex-industrial cities in Massachusetts, according
to a series of recent studies. Poverty in Lowell has gone up substantially
since 1980. And despite its "renaissance" reputation, empty storefronts
still dot Market Street, one of downtown's main drags. Lowell's national
reputation is fading, say urban planners and community development analysts,
as the city's impressive face lift has failed to yield the expected gains
for the working class.
"If I was writing a book 20 years ago, I would hold Lowell up as a great
success story," said Joel Kotkin, the author of "The City: A Global
History." "I don't think that's the case anymore."
The reassessment of Lowell comes at a time when increasing numbers of
American cities are grappling with the same challenges many New England
cities first encountered decades ago. Once-thriving industrial cities from
Louisville, Ky., to Dubuque, Iowa, are rushing to adopt plans to shore up
their economies as a broad variety of manufacturers move production
overseas. But, officials involved with developing revitalization strategies
say, the emphasis on large construction projects that characterized the
Lowell revival — big-ticket items such as the National Historical Park,
minor league baseball stadium, and hockey arena — have fallen out of
favor, replaced by a growing emphasis on more prosaic goals like retraining
workers and streamlining city governments.
Lowell's success at transforming its cityscape — dubbed "Mills to
Martinis" in one marketing campaign for downtown condos — has undoubtedly
helped the city, attracting middle-class commuters drawn to relatively cheap
housing near the MBTA commuter rail station. And Lowell has fared better in
many respects than cities such as Springfield or Lawrence, Forrant says,
thanks largely to its aggressive revitalization effort and impassioned civic
boosters like the late senator Paul Tsongas. (His wife, Niki Tsongas, won
the Democratic nomination for the Fifth Congressional District last week.)
But Lowell's gains have also been exaggerated by three decades of city
officials eager to tell an upbeat story, he said. And as time passes, some
of the shortcomings of Lowell's redevelopment model are beginning to show.
"People are beginning to worry and talk about the two Lowells — the one
of the interesting cultural revival and the one of these immigrant
neighborhoods that are not necessarily connected to renaissance Lowell,"
said Forrant. "You've got this juxtaposition that not everybody involved in
the revival wants to talk about."
For much of its history, Lowell has promoted itself as a prototype for
the nation. Perched next to waterfalls in the Merrimack River that provided
hydropower to the first mills, it was founded in the early 19th century as a
planned manufacturing city by a group of Boston investors, and became the
nation's leading textile maker before the Civil War. Newcomers from Ireland,
Greece, and Quebec immigrated to Lowell to work in the thriving mills, and
gravitated to ethnic neighborhoods like Little Canada, home to many
Quebecois, and the Acre, where many Greeks settled.
The city's collapse began after World War I, when the factories along
Lowell's sprawling canal system shut down in the face of competition from
Southern textile manufacturers. Workers moved out, leaving vacant
boardinghouses and churches with vanishing congregations. Little Canada was
demolished in the 1950s.
Under the direction of Tsongas — a Lowell native who represented the
region in the US House of Representatives from 1975 to 1979 and in the
Senate from 1979 to 1985 — the city cleaned up many decaying ex-mill
buildings, and created Lowell National Historical Park, the nation's first
urban national park, in 1978. By recycling old buildings instead of ripping
them down, Lowell's strategy represented new thinking at the time, when
urban renewal was still often synonymous with the bulldozer. More signs of
revival emerged in 1978, when Wang Laboratories opened its headquarters in
the city, a complex that eventually occupied three downtown buildings. A web
of old Boston and Maine Railroad tracks that once carried boxcars to the
mills was turned into a trolley system that zips tourists around the
national park in vintage streetcars. New waves of immigrants from Cambodia
and Latin America arrived. By the early 1990s, when Tsongas ran for the
Democratic presidential nomination, he was able to boast in his campaign
autobiography that his hometown was a "national model of urban renaissance."
In 1992, Wang declared bankruptcy, reversing some of the city's economic
gains. But Lowell embarked on a second wave of revitalization in the 1990s,
opening a performing arts and hockey arena and building a new baseball
stadium for the Lowell Spinners, a Single-A affiliate of the Red Sox. The
city also encouraged developers to build more market-rate condos to lure
white-collar professionals into town.
In all, economists and development analysts credit Lowell's efforts since
the 1970s with attracting millions of visitors to the city and fueling the
arrival of more middle-class residents. Mark Muro, the director of policy at
the Brookings Institution's Metropolitan Policy Program in Washington, said
that Lowell deserves credit for demonstrating "one of the earliest and most
important examples nationally of truly repositioning one of the satellite
industrial cities." Lowell's creative reuse of old buildings was an
inspiration to other cities that wanted to rejuvenate their economies
without losing touch with their roots.
But the city's transformation has not always lifted all boats
economically, according to studies. The number of people living in poverty
in Lowell went up 41.6 percent between the 1980 and 2000 censuses, compared
with 14.4 percent in Brockton and Fall River and 33.4 percent in Worcester
over the same period, according to a report issued in December by the
Citizens' Housing and Planning Association, a Boston-based
affordable-housing nonprofit.
"The one thing that was kind of surprising to us is that from 1980 to
2000 Lowell didn't do as well as we had anticipated," said Karen Sunnarborg,
a housing consultant in Jamaica Plain and the author of the study, who said
that Lowell's reputation during that period had led her to expect better
poverty results in the city's census data. For example, she said, Lawrence
cut poverty by 10 percent between 1990 and 2000, according to census
figures, compared with a more modest 4.7 decline in Lowell.
"As of 2000 there wasn't a lot of data that pointed to great success,"
she said.
Another report issued this February by Brookings and MassInc., which
examined the performance of ex-mill cities in Massachusetts, found that per
capita incomes in Lowell went up 27.2 percent between 1980 and 2000,
slightly above average for the 11 cities studied but well behind the leader,
Haverhill, where incomes rose 57.7 percent in the same period.
Bernard Lynch, the city manager of Lowell, argues that poverty rates
don't tell the whole story, saying that poverty is often linked to national
trends more than local policies.
"Almost every community nationwide has seen some type of increase in the
poverty rate in that period of time," he said. "There's a bigger issue here
than just the city of Lowell."
Moreover, he said, the city's poverty rates reflect, at least in part,
the decision dating to the 1970s not to raze poor sections of the city
during the redevelopment process.
"If we had gone into some of these neighborhoods and taken an approach
that pushed people out, our numbers might look a lot better, but then you'd
be calling in saying, There's been gentrification there!" he said. "When you
have those types of variety in housing options, you're going to have people
of limited means living in the city."
But Forrant said that high-profile projects like the $11 million
LeLacheur Park, the riverfront baseball stadium, have yielded meager
results. Studies by his students have shown few tangible benefits from the
stadium, he said, since most jobs there are low-wage.
Lynch defended the stadium and the arena, which he said would bring
long-term benefits for the city's image and quality of life.
"When you look at the arena, frankly, right now it's a money-loser for
us, but it enhances the image of the city and pride within the city and it
will ultimately be able to handle its own costs," he said. "But some of that
is very difficult to quantify. Same with the ballpark — it sells out all the
time. It brings people into Lowell, and that's beneficial to the people that
live here."
In the 30 years since Lowell began its revitalization campaign, the wave
of deindustrialization that destroyed the New England textile industry after
World War II has spread to the rest of the country, bringing down
once-iconic American industries from steel to farm equipment and forcing
hundreds of cities to confront the same wrenching questions about their
future that Lowell first faced decades ago.
In Louisville, for instance — where city leaders in the 1970s bragged
that their economy was "recession-proof" because of its wide manufacturing
base — layoffs at major employers like General Electric and Brown &
Williamson Tobacco began in the 1980s. Pittsburgh's famous steelmakers
collapsed.
"Economic development has become much more of a ubiquitous concern," said
Joseph Seneca, a professor at Rutgers University who has tracked
redevelopment efforts in the Northeast. Even service sector and finance jobs
are now being sent overseas, he said, meaning not only ex-industrial cities
are in trouble.
But urban specialists say those cities are increasingly adopting
strategies much different than the plans Lowell pioneered in the 1980s,
instead placing a heavy emphasis on training workers and shying away from
expensive construction projects whose economic benefits are often vague.
Muro said that many cities are trying to keep their focus on fundamentals,
rather than get swept up in "idea viruses" — fads like conventions centers
and stadiums that desperate cities had once looked at as economic panaceas.
They are also making efforts to restructure municipal governments to make
them more nimble in response to changing economic conditions.
In Louisville, for instance, the city and county governments merged and
several neighboring counties entered into informal "non-compete" agreements
so the region would speak to potential employers with one voice, said
Carolyn Gatz, the director of the Greater Louisville Project, a civic group.
Ron Kitchens, the director of Southwest Michigan First, a planning agency
in Kalamazoo, Mich., a region that lost jobs when the former Upjohn
pharmaceuticals company was acquired by Pfizer in 1995, said he has noticed
that planners have shifted their focus away from campaigns to attract a few
big employers and have become more wary of importing a template from another
city.
"The thing you have to remember about economic development strategies is
that they are constantly changing and evolving because the country is
constantly changing and evolving," he said.
Lynch dismissed the suggestion that Lowell is behind the times, pointing
out that the city has also changed its approach, and has embarked on efforts
to provide more job training and to work with neighboring cities to attract
employers. Indeed, he said, experimentation is also a part of the Lowell
model.
"[Lowell] takes a new idea, runs with it, makes the city a better place,
and then there's sort of a lag, then it goes in a new direction of more
improvement," Lynch said. "Lowell almost takes two steps forward and one
step back constantly."
Alan Wirzbicki is a Globe correspondent based in Washington, D.C.