San Diego Union-Tribune - April
17, 2008
The Fed's inflation gauge
isn't realistic, critics say
By Dean Calbreath
ou've
seen the cost of a gallon of premium gas breach the $4 mark at local
stations. You've seen the price of milk, eggs, corn and bread surge at your
supermarket. Yesterday, the government confirmed that prices are continuing
to rise at a very brisk pace.
In March, consumer prices rose 0.34 percent, for an annualized rate of
more than 4 percent, according to the U.S. Department of Labor. That's only
slightly lower than the 2007 annual rate of 4.1 percent – which was the
highest inflation rate this decade.
On the other hand, so-called core inflation – which excludes energy and
food prices because they are considered volatile – rose only 0.15 percent,
or 2.4 percent over the past year, which is close to the Federal Reserve's 2
percent comfort zone.
For the Federal Reserve, the core inflation rate amounts to a green light
to continue its policy of lowering interest rates in order to keep the
economy from falling into a deep recession. A higher inflation rate could
conceivably make the central bank freeze or raise interest rates.
But many economists say the core rate does not show how inflation is
affecting the typical consumer. Because salary raises for most people are
not keeping pace with the rising cost of living, people are using a greater
percentage of their wages to buy a smaller amount of goods.
“Food prices and the price of gas are really eroding the purchasing power
not just of the working class, but people in the middle class, who are
already beginning to have a hard time making ends meet,” said business-trend
consultant Joel Kotkin.
John Williams, who spent more than two decades as an economic consultant
to Fortune 500 companies, said the government figures understate the true
rate of inflation.
Williams, who runs Shadow Government Statistics in Oakland, which tracks
changes in inflation, unemployment, the gross national product and other
data, said that over the past 25 years, the government has changed the
method of calculating price increases in ways that have lowered the reported
inflation rate.
The changes include measuring the cost of shelter by rental prices
instead of home values, as well as giving nearly as much weight to
high-ticket items such as cars and electronics as to daily necessities such
as food and gasoline.
According to Williams, if the government measured inflation based on
pre-1982 methods, it would be running at 11.6 percent right now, or 7.3
percent using pre-1998 calculations.
“I don't think the government numbers are too credible,” Williams said.
“When they say food inflation is moving up by 0.2 percent, that just doesn't
match what we're seeing in the market. But even if inflation is as low as
they are reporting, it's high enough to be terribly destructive to the
economy.”
A number of other analysts echo that viewpoint. Rudolph-Riad Younes,
co-manager of the Julius Baer International Equity Fund, estimated in
December that inflation was running at 8 percent to 10 percent.
San Diego investment guru Richard Russell said in a recent newsletter
that the Federal Reserve “makes up its own inflation figures. True inflation
is running wild.”
Other economists are skeptical of such claims. James Hamilton, an
economist at the University of California San Diego, said changes in the
inflation rate over the past 25 years “don't represent huge differences”
from the way overall inflation is currently measured.
On the other hand, Hamilton said he does “not take too much comfort in
the core inflation rate.” He noted that food and energy prices have been
rising steadily for several years and that polls show consumers now expect
inflation to continue rising at more than 4 percent.
“I would think that would really be troubling to the Federal Reserve,”
Hamilton said.
Economists say inflation has forced consumers to cut back on the goods
they are buying.
“Everybody's cutting back and getting squeezed in one way or another,”
said Michael Belch, a marketing professor at San Diego State University. “If
you're a blue-collar worker paying more and more for gas so you can drive to
work each day, there comes a point where you become inelastic, and you have
to start deciding there are things you just can't spend money on anymore.”
Nearly 56 percent of Americans believe their current economic standard of
living is declining, according to a national poll this month by the Sacred
Heart University Polling Institute in Connecticut. That number is up from 24
percent in 2006. Only 38 percent of respondents said their standard of
living is improving, compared with 72 percent in 2006.
“Clearly, the crisis in the credit markets coupled with significant
increases in not just gas but also food have combined to make the average
American feel poorer and pessimistic about the future,” said John Gerlach,
an associate business professor at Sacred Heart.
In high-cost areas such as San Diego County, the effects of inflation are
even more pronounced, since prices often rise faster than local salaries.
Although the Labor Department does not release monthly data on regional
inflation, its annual data show that in the past five years, consumer prices
in the county have jumped 22 percent, compared with 16 percent nationwide.
“The three main reasons were our housing prices, gas prices, and
electricity and utility rates, which were all rising faster than the
national average,” said Kelly Cunningham, an economist with the San Diego
Institute for Policy Research.
Thanks to the softness in the county's housing market, inflation softened
last year to 2.3 percent, compared with the national rate of 3.1 percent.
Recently, the primary driver of inflation – both in the nation and the
county – has been the rising cost of fuel.
In San Diego County, the average price of a gallon of regular gasoline
rose 18 percent, from about $3.23 in March 2007 to $3.83 on Monday,
according to the Utility Consumers' Action Network, which tracks fuel and
utility prices.
The rising price of fuel has pushed up other items as well, notably food,
which depends on oil for transportation, cultivation equipment and
fertilizers.
Since last March, the price of eggs has gone up 35 percent; bananas, 17
percent; bread, 16 percent; apples and chicken, 10 percent; and ground beef,
7 percent, according to Labor Department data.
These price rises have been particularly hurtful to people living on
fixed incomes – including the elderly – since their government-provided
benefits are lagging behind the rising costs. Social Security and other
government benefits are tied to the official inflation rate.
“Inflation is really hurting seniors, because they're on fixed income and
food is costing more and more,” said Father Joe Carroll, who runs the Father
Joe's Villages charitable organization.
Carroll said inflation is wreaking havoc with his own budget because –
among other things – the rising price of gasoline is adding to his costs of
transportation and picking up donations of furniture and clothing.
“Everything we're looking at is going up,” Carroll said. “Inflation and
the downturn in the housing market (are) having a huge impact on us. I've
been working all day looking at ways of cutting my budget. For the first
time in 25 years, I'm thinking of cutting programs.”
* * *